Back to Convex Arbitrage
Convex Arbitrage

Why Street Turns Are No Longer an Optimization — They're a Labor Strategy

January 18, 20268 min readHampson Strategies
Why Street Turns Are No Longer an Optimization — They're a Labor Strategy

Why Street Turns Are No Longer an Optimization — They're a Labor Strategy

Street turns are still discussed as a throughput or cost tactic.

That framing is outdated.

In a market where qualified driver labor is structurally constrained, street turns are no longer about efficiency.

They are about preserving human capacity inside a system that no longer has slack.

![Street Turn Labor Strategy](https://static.readdy.ai/image/ae9ec014515e612453686d280f50ae00/050767ecd0890575ace2e6f684fa41c4.jpeg)

The Labor Constraint No One Models Correctly

Most networks treat driver availability as an input.

In reality, it behaves like a hard constraint with delayed feedback.

  • Each empty mile doesn't just cost money
  • It consumes irreplaceable driver time
  • That time cannot be replenished on demand
  • And its loss propagates across future moves

Optimizing street turns isn't about saving miles.

It's about protecting labor time from irreversible waste.

Why Street Turns Change the System Epistemically

A single street turn reduces one empty move.

A recursively optimized street turn changes what the system knows is possible.

  • Stops assuming empty repositioning will be available later
  • Preserves drivers for revenue-generating moves
  • Avoids scheduling decisions that require slack that no longer exists

This is epistemic optimization: The system updates its beliefs about future capacity before reality forces it to.

Recursive Prediction Turns Labor into a Convex Asset

  • Labor loss is linear
  • Savings are local
  • Gains are easily matched by competitors
  • Preserved labor compounds across days
  • Reduced empty miles free drivers before they are needed
  • Downstream congestion is avoided rather than absorbed
  • The benefit grows faster than the effort invested

That's convexity.

The Asymmetric Advantage Most Networks Miss

Here's the critical point:

Street-turn recursion doesn't just help you.

It harms competitors who don't see it early.

  • Reuses containers earlier
  • Pulls drivers forward into productive moves
  • Consumes fewer empty repositioning slots
  • Lose access to the same labor pool
  • Experience tighter availability
  • Pay higher premiums for recovery
  • Suffer volatility later in the week

The advantage isn't shared.

It's asymmetric.

Why This Is Already Showing Up in the Market

  • Commit fewer drivers defensively
  • Avoid over-promising during compression
  • Maintain service stability without price spikes
  • Appear "lucky" when the week tightens
  • Sudden labor gaps
  • Forced reassignments
  • Higher spot exposure
  • Explanation calls that arrive too late

This isn't execution quality.

It's epistemic positioning.

What Street-Turn Optimization Really Buys You

  • Reduce deadhead miles and labor burn
  • Preserve driver availability for high-value legs
  • Stabilize service under pressure
  • Shift competitive dynamics quietly
  • Create benefits competitors only notice after they've lost them

This isn't throughput optimization.

It's capacity control under constraint.

Closing

In a labor-constrained market, every empty mile is a strategic decision.

Optimizing street turns without recursion saves money.

Optimizing them with recursion reshapes the network — and the labor market around it.

By the time competitors react, the advantage has already compounded.

And in systems governed by time and labor, late recognition isn't neutral.

It's expensive.

Share:
Talk with Us