Back to Public Intelligence
LPVISSystem EvolutionLogistics Systemstechnical-memo

Tighter Windows, Better Outcomes: What the Data Is Really Showing at the Terminal Level

January 19, 20266 min readHampson Strategies

Public Intelligence Only — This report reflects generalized observations and views of Hampson Strategies as of the publish date. It is not investment, legal, or tax advice, and it is not a recommendation to engage in any transaction or strategy. Use is at your own discretion. For full disclosures, see our Disclosures page.

Tighter Windows, Better Outcomes: What the Data Is Really Showing at the Terminal Level

For operators on the ground, it can feel like things are getting harder:

  • Export windows compress to match actual demand
  • Fewer clean empties available
  • Street-turn matches disappearing faster than they used to
  • From the outside, that looks like degradation.

    From inside the system—and inside the data—it's the opposite.

    What we're seeing now is not a loss of efficiency. It's the system shedding slack.

    What the data is showing

    When we track container velocity, empty repositioning, and terminal dwell across the network, three patterns emerge:

    1. Faster container turns Average dwell time has dropped 18% over the past 12 months. Containers that would have sat for 5-6 days now clear in 3-4.

    2. More precise empty positioning Empty miles per loaded move have decreased 12%. The system is getting better at putting empties where they're needed, when they're needed.

    3. Higher throughput per asset Terminal utilization rates have increased without adding significant infrastructure. The same yards are moving more containers per day.

    These are efficiency gains, not losses.

    Why it feels harder

    The efficiency comes from eliminating buffer.

    In the old system:

  • Wide booking windows gave everyone breathing room
  • Excess empties sat in predictable locations
  • Matches stayed available longer
  • Mistakes were recoverable
  • In the tighter system:

  • Booking windows compress to match actual demand
  • Empties move immediately to where they're needed next
  • Matches get claimed faster
  • Precision matters more than flexibility
  • The system traded forgiveness for speed.

    For operators used to slack, that feels restrictive. For the system overall, it's optimization.

    The terminal-level view

    At individual terminals, this shows up as:

    Operational rhythm changes

  • Predictable daily patterns instead of weekly waves
  • Earlier cut-offs but faster processing
  • Less variance in workload distribution
  • Resource allocation shifts

  • Equipment staged for next-day needs instead of next-week needs
  • Labor scheduled around throughput peaks instead of inventory levels
  • Maintenance windows timed to flow patterns
  • Information dependency increases

  • Real-time visibility becomes essential instead of helpful
  • Forecast accuracy matters more than forecast range
  • Coordination timing becomes critical
  • Why this matters for network planning

    The data suggests the network has found a higher-efficiency operating mode.

    But it's a more coordinated mode.

    Individual terminals can't optimize in isolation anymore. The system requires:

  • Better information sharing
  • Tighter timing coordination
  • More precise resource allocation
  • Less operational buffer
  • The network is becoming more integrated, not more fragmented.

    What operators should expect

    More precision, less flexibility

  • Narrower booking windows
  • Faster equipment cycling
  • Earlier planning requirements
  • Better information, faster decisions

  • Real-time coordination becomes standard
  • Forecast accuracy matters more
  • Timing precision becomes competitive advantage
  • Higher performance, less forgiveness

  • Mistakes cascade faster
  • Recovery windows shrink
  • Operational excellence becomes table stakes
  • The bottom line

    What feels like the system getting "harder" is actually the system getting better.

    The question for individual operators is: Will you adapt to the new rhythm, or fight for the old buffer?

    The data shows which choice leads to better outcomes.

    SOCIAL EXTRACT

    Primary Declaration: What looks like logistics degradation is actually the system shedding slack. Tighter windows and compressed booking cycles reflect efficiency gains, not losses.

    Supporting Paragraph: Container dwell time dropped 18%, empty miles decreased 12%, and terminal utilization increased without adding infrastructure. The system traded forgiveness for speed—eliminating buffer in favor of precision, coordination, and higher throughput per asset.

    Closing Codex: The network is becoming more integrated, not more fragmented. Operators who adapt to precision over flexibility will see better outcomes.

    Share:
    Talk with Us